Hunter

MEMORANDUM **

Chasity Hunter appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer Home Depot on her claims that: (1) Home Depot refused her request for reasonable accommodations for her disability, in violation of the *655 Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and its Oregon counterpart, Or.Rev.Stat. § 659A.100 et seq.; (2) Home Depot retaliated against her for requesting reasonable accommodations by disciplining her for her tardiness and reducing her work schedule, in violation of the ADA and Oregon law; (3) Home Depot denied her request for medical leave, in violation of federal Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., and the Oregon Family Leave Act, Or.Rev.Stat. § 659A.150 et seq.; and (4) Home Depot wrongfully constructively discharged her, under Oregon Common law.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment, Schnidrig v. Columbia Mach., Inc., 80 F.3d 1406 , 1408 (9th Cir.1996).

Home Depot argues that summary judgment in its favor was appropriate on Hunter’s federal and state reasonable accommodation claims and family and medical…