Inquiry Concerning Ross

Good Law
1998 Cal. Comm. Jud. Perform. LEXIS 2·48 Cal. 4th CJP Supp. 19
State of California Commission on Judicial PerformanceApril 27, 1998No. 141California8,607 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bonnerchairperson, J.

*CJP Supp. 21 Opinion

This disciplinary matter concerns Judge James Randal Ross (retired), formerly a judge of the Orange County Superior Court. The Commission on Judicial Performance (Commission) concludes that Judge Ross committed willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute. The Commission censures Judge Ross and bars him from receiving assignments, appointments, or references of work from any California state court.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Judge Ross served as a judge of the Orange County Superior Court from 1983 to 1995. The events which are the subject of this matter took place *CJP Supp. 22 during the 1992 to 1995 time period, while Judge Ross was serving as a full-time superior court judge. Judge Ross retired on July 7, 1995.

This matter was commenced on December 11, 1996, with the issuance of a notice of formal proceedings. The notice was amended on June 2, 1997. Judge Ross filed answers to both notices and denied any misconduct.

At the Commission’s request, the Supreme Court appointed three special masters to conduct an evidentiary proceeding and to prepare a written report. 1 Eighty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.