In re Inquiry Concerning Velasquez

Good Law
49 Cal. 4th CJP Supp. 175
State of California Commission on Judicial PerformanceApril 25, 2007No. 180California14,320 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hornchairperson, J.

*CJP Supp. 182 Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

This disciplinary matter concerns Judge José A. Velasquez of the Monterey County Superior Court. On April 25, 2006, the commission filed a notice of formal proceedings against Judge Velasquez in which it charges Judge Velasquez with the following misconduct:

The Supreme Court appointed three special masters who held an evidentiary hearing and reported to the commission. The masters are Justice Laurence D. Rubin of the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, Judge Kevin M. McCarthy of the San Francisco County Superior Court, and Judge Eleanor Provost of the Tuolumne County Superior Court. The hearing before the masters took place in San Jose over three days commencing August 21, 2006, followed by oral argument before them on November 3, 2006. The masters presented their report to the commission on December 22, 2006.

The factual findings of the masters are largely undisputed. Although Judge Velasquez objects to some of the masters’ legal conclusions, he concedes numerous incidents of serious misconduct. Judge Velasquez also concedes that he has engaged in prior misconduct resulting in a censure in 1997, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.