In re Inquiry Concerning MacEachern

Good Law
49 Cal. 4th CJP Supp. 289
State of California Commission on Judicial PerformanceJune 26, 2008No. 184California8,892 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McConnellchairperson, J.

*CJP Supp. 292 Opinion

I

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

This disciplinary matter concerns Judge Kelly A. MacEachern, a judge of the Orange County Superior Court since 2003. The commission commenced this inquiry with the filing of its notice of formal proceedings (Notice) on August 13, 2007.

The Notice charges Judge MacEachern in one count with making intentionally false and misleading statements in an e-mail to the superior court travel coordinator in support of her reimbursement claim for hotel expenses associated with her attendance at the Continuing Judicial Studies Program (CJSP) in San Diego the week of July 31, 2006. Judge MacEachern is charged with making the following false and misleading statements: (1) there was a “mix up” in her registration when she arrived at the conference; and (2) she “sat in” on two classes on days for which she sought hotel reimbursement. The *CJP Supp. 293 Notice alleges there was not a mixup with her registration—when she arrived at registration, she knew she was only registered for one half-day class later in the week; and, she did not attend the two classes she claimed to have “sat in” on.

The Supreme Court appointed three special masters to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.