Inquiry Concerning O'Flaherty

Good Law
2010 Cal. Comm. Jud. Perform. LEXIS 3·50 Cal. 4th CJP Supp. 1
State of California Commission on Judicial PerformanceSeptember 23, 2010No. 188California5,151 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McConnellchairperson, J.

*CJP Supp. 3 Opinion

I

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

This disciplinary matter concerns Judge Joseph W. O’Flaherty, a judge of the Placer County Superior Court. The Commission on Judicial Performance commenced this inquiry with the filing of its notice of formal proceedings (Notice) on February 3, 2010. The Notice charges Judge O’Flaherty with disregard of the law, abuse of authority, embroilment and denial of due *CJP Supp. 4 process. It alleges that the misconduct occurred during a court proceeding in which the judge issued a no-contact order without following any of the applicable procedural requirements and without affording plaintiff notice or an opportunity to be heard.

The Supreme Court appointed three special masters who held an evidentiary hearing and reported to the commission. The masters are Hon. Stephen J. Kane, Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, Hon. Larry W. Allen, Judge of the San Bernardino County Superior Court, and Hon. Allan D. Hardcastle, Judge of the Sonoma County Superior Court. Judge O’Flaherty is represented by James A. Murphy of Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney in San Francisco, California. The examiners for the commission…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.