Pintard

Sessions v. Pintard

Good Law
21 F. Cas. 1089·1854 U.S. App. LEXIS 501
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 1854California754 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This day came the complainants by Pike and Cummins, their solicitors, and the defendant by S. H. Hemp-stead, his solicitor, and by agreement the answer of said Pintard is to have the like *1090 effect as if sworn to, and the complainants enter their general replication to the said answer in short on the record by consent. And, l>y consent of parties, this cause was submitted to the court, and came on for final hearing on bill and exhibits, answer and exhibits, and replication to the answer. On consideration whereof it is the opinion of the court, that the appropriation of the proceeds of the sale of the land, under the original decree referred to in the bill, was rightfully and properly made, and that the judgment mentioned in this bill is not entitled to any greater credit than that given by the said Pintard, as shown by the entry made on the record; and that the complainants are not entitled to the relief prayed for in their bill, and that the injunction ought to be dissolved, and the bill dismissed, for want of equity, with costs. It is, therefore, considered, adjudged, and decreed by the court here in chancery sitting, that the injunction heretofore granted in this ease be and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.