Larkin

United States v. Larkin

Good Law
26 F. Cas. 870
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 1855California719 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hoffman, J.

In this ease the claim of the appellees was confirmed by the board of commissioners. An appeal from that decision was taken to this .court But the case has been submitted by the district attorney without the statement of any objection to the validity of the claim on the part of the United States. The original grant by Governor Mieheltorena- to Manuel Jimeno is dated in November, 1844. The conveyance to the present claimants is dated August 30, 1847. The grant is fully proved. Nor is its genuineness called in question. The grant appears to have been submitted to the departmental assembly, and referred to-a committee on vacant lands, June 3, 1S46, but no further action on it is shown to have been had.

The expediente, however, was returned to and is found among the government archives. Had the action of the assembly been unfavorable, the governor should have transmitted it to the supreme government for its resolution. Regulations of 1828, § 6. The fact, therefore, that the expediente was not so transmitted, but was returned like other approved grants to the archives, renders it highly probable that the approval of the assembly was actually obtained. The absence, however, of that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.