United States v. Murphy

Good Law
27 F. Cas. 36·1863 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 1863California587 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hoffman, J.

The official survey in this case was originally ordered into court for examination prior to the passage of the act of 1860. The cause was heard and a decree made, setting the survey aside and adopting a previous survey, made by A. W. Thompson, United States deputy surveyor. A motion was subsequently made for a rehearing, but it remained unargued and undisposed of up to the date of the passage of the act of 1860. As by that law, all pending cases were subjected to its provisions, it was considered by the court that the operation of the decree, as a final judgment, was in effect suspended by the motion for a rehearing, and that the case was “pending,” within the meaning and intent of the law. Proceedings, as required by the act of 1860, were accordingly had. Advertisements were published, and time afforded to the claimants and to the parties intervening to produce testimony.

No evidence whatever, in addition to that before the court at the time of making the decree adopting the Thompson survey, has been ¡produced on the part of those who object to that survey. The claimants, however, have offered testimony corroboratory of that on which the decree was made. The final decree of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.