Rico

United States v. Rico

Good Law
27 F. Cas. 809
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 1856California297 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hoffman, J.

The claim in this case was confirmed by the board of commissioners We have examined the testimony contained in the transcript, and, though there is room for doubt as to the genuineness of the grant, we have found nothing to justify us in reversing the decision on the ground that it is a forgery. It is true that a fatality not usual seems to have attended this grant, for not only do the signatures of Jimeno and Mieheltorena present a somewhat suspicious appearance, but the expediente, which might have confirmed or dispelled doubts as- to the authenticity of the grant, has been lost while in the custody of an officer to whom such documents were not ordinarily entrusted. But whatever doubts may be suggested by these and other circumstances, we are met by the positive testimony of witnesses who saw the graDt executed, as they swear, and one of whom actually drew it up. The board who heard the witnesses testify, and who had other means of judging of their credibility than this court possesses, confirmed the claim; and the case has been submitted to this court without argument or observation of any kind on the part of the United States. No additional testimony has been taken since the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.