P.

P. v. Cuevas CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2013C070790California2,529 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/29/ P. v. Cuevas CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE, C070790

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 11F03397) v.

ROJELIO CUEVAS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Rojelio Cuevas has asked this court to review the record to determine whether there exist any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Counsel advised defendant of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief, and defendant has filed a brief claiming error. As we will explain, we are not persuaded by his claims; further, we see no arguable error that would result in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.