Mestre

Mestre v. Vivendi Universal U.S. Holding Co.

Good Law
273 F. App'x 631
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 2008No. 05-35942California311 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Yvonne Mestre (“Mestre”) appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the defendants in her copyright infringement claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1338 (a) and (b) and we affirm.

Mestre claims the author, producers, and others involved in the creation of the movie Billy Elliot (collectively, “the defendants”) stole her original screenplay, The Sunday Hat. Contending that there are genuine issues of material fact regarding both access and substantial similarity, she argues that the question of copyright infringement should be presented to the jury. Because we agree with the district court that the scripts are not substantially similar, we do not reach the question of access. See Olson v. Nat’l Broad. Co., Inc., 855 F.2d 1446 , 1448 (9th Cir.1988).

Having reviewed the record, we conclude that there are some general similarities between The Sunday Hat and Billy Elliott. These similarities, however, do not extend beyond generic plot lines, or scenes a faire, which are not protected by copyright law. See Funky Films, Inc. v. Time Warner Entm’t, 462 F.3d 1072 , 1077 (9th Cir.2006). Although “[a]t first blush, these apparent similarities appear…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.