P.

P. v. Devizcarra CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2013C070856California1,470 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/29/13 P. v. Devizcarra CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo)

THE PEOPLE, C070856

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No.

CRF 080006580)

v.

JAIME FERNANDO DEVIZCARRA,

Defendant and Appellant.

Sentenced to state prison for committing assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code,1 § 245, subd. (a)(1)), with an enhancement for personally inflicting great bodily injury (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)), and second degree burglary (§ 459), defendant Jaime Fernando Devizcarra contends only that the trial court abused its discretion in making its order of restitution to victim Edim Kurtovic. (§ 1202.4, subd. (f).) We disagree and shall affirm.

Undesignated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.