In re C.A. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant S.V. (Mother) is the mother of C.A., a girl born in June
2003 and now nearly 10 years of age. Mother appeals from the juvenile court‟s June 28,
2012, orders denying her petition for further reunification or family maintenance services
(Welf. & Inst. Code, § 388),1 terminating her parental rights to C.A., and placing C.A. for
adoption (§ 366.26).
Mother raises three claims on this appeal. She first claims that the juvenile court
abused its discretion and denied her a fair hearing in refusing to continue the combined
sections 388 and 366.26 hearings on June 28, 2012. (§ 352.) She also claims the court
abused its discretion in denying her section 388 petition on its merits and in refusing to
apply the parental beneficial exception to the statutory preference for adoption at the
section 366.26 hearing. (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).)
We find no error and affirm the challenged orders.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. The Initial Dependency Proceedings (July 2008-January 2010)
In July 2008, plaintiff and respondent Riverside County Department of Public
Social Services (DPSS) filed a dependency petition regarding Mother‟s…