P.
P. v. Thomas CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Mcdonald, J.
FACTS
At the readiness conference, there was no plea agreement with the district
attorney's office. However, the trial court had indicated that if Thomas pleaded guilty the
court would impose a maximum sentence of 32 months in state prison, to run
concurrently with any term for his parole violation, and would consider commitment to
the California Rehabilitation Center (CRC). Considering those assurances, Thomas
pleaded guilty to all charges and admitted all allegations.
At the subsequent sentencing hearing, defense counsel stated Thomas wished to
withdraw his guilty plea. The basis for withdrawing the plea was that Thomas, as well as
counsel and the court, believed commitment to CRC was an option, but that option had
been foreclosed by extraneous events. The court advised Thomas that, even if it had been
legally permitted to grant Thomas a return to CRC, it would not have granted his request
because of the information in the probation report, but it would still adhere to the other
previously-indicated benefit of imposing a 32-month sentence, and asked Thomas what
2 he wished to do. After conferring with Thomas, defense counsel stated he wanted to
proceed to…