P.

P. v. Ponce CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 2, 2013C072034California545 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/2/13 P. v. Ponce CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sutter) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C072034

v. (Super. Ct. No. CRF112268)

RAMON MERCADO PONCE,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Ramon Mercado Ponce asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment. I Law enforcement officers executed a search warrant on defendant’s residence and found .81 grams of methamphetamine in defendant’s bedroom. Less than two months

1 later, law enforcement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.