Hancock

Hancock v. County of Plumas CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 2, 2013C071084California4,175 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/2/13 Hancock v. County of Plumas CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Plumas) ----

KAYE HANCOCK, C071084

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CV09-00255)

v.

COUNTY OF PLUMAS et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

According to the trial court’s register of actions, plaintiff Kaye Hancock initiated this action on October 5, 2009, with a complaint that is not of record. In the April 2010 pleading at issue (the second amended complaint), plaintiff included seven counts1 naming defendant County of Plumas (the County) either singly or together with the

1 The pleading engages in the common loose practice of calling these causes of action without regard to whether each one actually constitutes a separate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.