P.

P. v. Ochoa CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 2013C071443California256 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

1 Because the matter was resolved by plea, our statement of facts is taken from the prosecutor’s statement of factual basis and the probation officer’s report.

2 However, our review discloses three minor errors on the abstract of judgment. First, the $40 court operations assessment is erroneously listed as $30. Second, the $30 court facilities assessment is omitted. Third, a $10 fine pursuant to Penal Code section 1202.5 is listed although no such fine was imposed.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed. The trial court is directed to correct the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.