Perkins Coie v. Viacom CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 6, 2013B238420California5,296 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/6/13 Perkins Coie v. Viacom CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

PERKINS COIE LLP, B238420

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC425223) v.

VIACOM, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order and judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. James R. Dunn, Judge. Reversed with directions.

Aires Law Firm, Timothy Carl Aires for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Kendall Brill & Klieger, Richard B. Kendall, Richard M. Simon for Defendant and Respondent.

___________________________________________________ In May 2010, defendant, already in default, learned that plaintiff was seeking a default judgment. Nevertheless, defendant did not move to vacate the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.