Raygoza
Raygoza v. Trejo CA4/3
Opinion
Opinion
Aronson, J.
Filed 5/06/13 Raygoza v. Trejo CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
OMAR RAYGOZA,
G046855
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 06FL000812) v.
OPINION
YVETTE R. TREJO,
Defendant and Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Richard G.
Vogl, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.
Julie A. Ringquist for Defendant and Appellant.
Omar Raygoza, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Respondent.
* * * Yvette Trejo appeals from the trial court‟s order altering the custody and
visitation arrangements for her six-year-old daughter, B., in favor of B.‟s father, Omar
Raygoza. Trejo contends the trial court erred by taking judicial notice of its own records
without specifying which, if any,…