Cipriano

United States v. Cipriano

Good Law
274 F. App'x 563
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 2008No. 07-10292California141 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ian Juan Cipriano (“Cipriano”) appeals the 51-month term of imprisonment imposed by the district judge upon the second revocation of Cipriano’s supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for reasonableness, United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir.2006), and we affirm. 1

Cipriano argues that the district judge based his above-Guidelines sentence on improper considerations. We disagree, and conclude that the district court relied on permissible factors in revoking Cipriano’s supervised release and formulating his sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583 ; Miqbel, 444 F.3d at 1182-83 .

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we do not recount it in detail here.