Pham

Pham v. Bank of America CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 7, 2013C069629California2,971 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/7/13 Pham v. Bank of America CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sutter) ----

RICHARD WILSON PHAM, C069629

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CVCS101845)

v.

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

In this action, commenced in August 2010, plaintiff Richard Wilson Pham sought to hold defendants Bank of America Corporation (Bank of America) and The Ryland Group, Inc. (Ryland) liable for wrongfully convincing him to secure a home loan he did not qualify for and could not afford in February 2006. His claim is based on false information in loan applications that he claimed he was not aware of until years later. The trial court sustained defendants‟ demurrers, concluding Pham‟s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.