Jeffrey

Jeffrey v. Kleefeld CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 7, 2013H036632California4,576 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mihara, J.

Filed 5/7/13 Jeffrey v. Kleefeld CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

FRANCIS JEFFREY et al., H036632 (Monterey County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. M99891)

v.

CAROLYN MARY KLEEFELD et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiffs Francis Jeffrey and Janine Gonsenhauser challenge a judgment entered on an order granting defendants‟ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs contend that triable issues of fact precluded summary judgment. We conclude that the trial court erred in summarily adjudicating the fraud cause of action but did not err in summarily adjudicating the remaining causes of action.

I. Plaintiffs’ Allegations

In July 2009, plaintiffs filed an action against defendants Carolyn Mary Kleefeld, 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.