P.
P. v. Ibarra CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Given Defendants’ issues on appeal, a shortened version of the facts will suffice;
however, further facts will be provided throughout the opinion as needed.
On the late evening of June 14, 2009, the Victim and Bryan Juarez, Michael
Hilliard, Juan Monge, and Juan Nieto went to Blair Park in San Bernardino to do some
target practicing with their airsoft2 guns. While at the park, Defendants approached
them. Defendant Ibarra had a black semiautomatic firearm pointed at them as Defendant
Sanchez went through everyone’s pockets. As Defendants began to walk away, the
Victim called out something to the effect of, “hey, if you put the gun down, we can
fight.” Defendant Ibarra, followed by Defendant Sanchez, immediately “[t]urned around
and took a few steps closer [to the Victim] and fired” into his face. Defendant Ibarra then
opened fire on the others. The Victim died.
II. GANG EXPERT TESTIMONY
Defendants contend the trial court erred in admitting testimony they were
affiliated with a gang. They argue the evidence was irrelevant and unduly prejudicial,
and that its admission violated their constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial.