Ayala-Cervantes

Ayala-Cervantes v. Mukasey

Good Law
275 F. App'x 605
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 2008No. 07-74758California302 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affir-mance of the immigration judge’s decision finding petitioner removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(6) for having pled guilty to falsely representing herself to be a citizen of the United States in violation of federal law pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1542 .

Petitioner presented one argument to the agency and to this court. She contends the waiver provision in 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (i) violated her equal protection rights because the statute does not provide the possibility of a discretionary waiver for those found removable for having fraudulently claimed United States citizenship pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(6)(ii), as it does for those found removable for having generally committed fraud or misrepresentation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(6)(i). We conclude that petitioner has failed to meet her burden to show that the statute’s classifications with regard to the availability of a waiver are “wholly irrational.” Tovar-Landin v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1164, 1167 (9th Cir.2004). Petitioner’s equal protection argument therefore fails.

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.