Moss

Moss v. Comfort Inn Woodland Hills

Good Law
275 F. App'x 717
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 2008No. 06-56625California66 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The district court’s finding that Moss did not have an intent to return to the Woodland Hills Comfort Inn on the date the lawsuit was filed is supported by substantial evidence in the record. The district court’s conclusion that Moss lacked standing is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.