P.

P. v. Griffin CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2013C068314California5,100 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/13/13 P. v. Griffin CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C068314

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 08F08267)

v.

TIMOTHY GRIFFIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

During bifurcated guilt and sanity proceedings before the trial court, defendant Timothy Griffin pleaded guilty to all charges—four counts of robbery, seven counts of assault with a firearm, and two counts of carjacking—received a sentencing lid of 23 years four months, and waived his right to a jury trial on the issue of sanity. After the sanity phase, the court found defendant failed to meet his burden of proof to show he was insane at the time of the offenses.

1 Defendant appeals his conviction, alleging (1)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.