P.

P. v. Oliver CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2013D062282California175 words

Opinion

Irion, J.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings in the trial court. Counsel presented no argument for reversal but invited this

court to review the record for error in accordance with Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.

Pursuant to Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, counsel identified as possible but not arguable

issues: (1) whether the guilty plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary; (2) whether

the trial court abused its discretion in denying the second Marsden motion; and

(3) whether any of the potential bases for reversal of the judgment listed in Oliver's

request for a certificate of probable cause are supported by the record. After we received

counsel's brief, we gave Oliver an opportunity to file a supplemental brief, but he did not

respond.

A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and Anders,

supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the issues suggested by counsel, has disclosed no

reasonably arguable appellate issue. Oliver has been adequately represented by counsel

on this appeal.

3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

IRION, J.

WE CONCUR:

MCCONNELL, P. J.

NARES, J.

4