P.
P. v. Oliver CA4/1
Opinion
Irion, J.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and
proceedings in the trial court. Counsel presented no argument for reversal but invited this
court to review the record for error in accordance with Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.
Pursuant to Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, counsel identified as possible but not arguable
issues: (1) whether the guilty plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary; (2) whether
the trial court abused its discretion in denying the second Marsden motion; and
(3) whether any of the potential bases for reversal of the judgment listed in Oliver's
request for a certificate of probable cause are supported by the record. After we received
counsel's brief, we gave Oliver an opportunity to file a supplemental brief, but he did not
respond.
A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and Anders,
supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the issues suggested by counsel, has disclosed no
reasonably arguable appellate issue. Oliver has been adequately represented by counsel
on this appeal.
3
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
IRION, J.
WE CONCUR:
MCCONNELL, P. J.
NARES, J.
4