Gal

Gal v. Panto USA CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 15, 2013D059582California366 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcintyre, J.

Filed 5/15/13 Gal v. Panto USA CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

LASZLO GAL et al., D059582

Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2008-00092714-

CU-BC-CTL)

PANTO USA, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Steven R.

Denton, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

Law Offices of Sean D. Schwerdtfeger, Sean D. Schwerdtfeger and Justin J.

Wieland for Defendant and Appellant.

Navigato & Battin, Michael W. Battin and Stephanie S. Sciarani for Plaintiffs and

Respondents.

A jury found in favor of plaintiffs Laszlo Gal and Agnes Christina Gal (together

the Gals) on their claim for breach of implied warranty against Panto USA, Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.