In re B.M. CA4/2

DISCUSSION

Minor appealed and, upon his request, this court appointed counsel to represent

him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d

436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of the case, a

1 The court found the second allegation, petty theft in violation of Penal Code section 484, subdivision (a), not true.

2 summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to conduct

an independent review of the record.

We offered minor an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but he has

not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have

independently reviewed the record for potential error and find no arguable issues.

III

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

HOLLENHORST

Acting P. J.

We concur:

KING

J.

CODRINGTON

J.

3