Anderson Private Investors v. Colak CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 16, 2013B239111California7,410 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/16/13 Anderson Private Investors v. Colak CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

KAYNE ANDERSON PRIVATE B239111

INVESTORS et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. BC462778)

v.

MUSTAFA COLAK,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Joanne B. O’Donnell, Judge. Affirmed.

Valle Makoff, Jeffrey T. Makoff, Brandon M. Carr; Nagler & Associates, Lawrence Nagler and Charles Avrith for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Lurie, Zepeda, Schmalz & Hogan, Andrew W. Zepeda and Shawn M. Ogle for Defendant and Respondent.

****** Plaintiffs and appellants Kayne Anderson Private Investors, L.P., Kayne Anderson Private Investors II,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.