Chamat

Chamat v. Latham & Watkins CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 17, 2013D061201California1,317 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/17/13 Chamat v. Latham & Watkins CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MAURICIO CHAMAT, D061201

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2011-00078536-

CU-MC-SC)

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, William S.

Cannon, Judge. Affirmed.

Mauricio Chamat, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Latham & Watkins and Robert J. Ellison for Defendant and Respondent.

Defendant Latham & Watkins LLP (Latham) deposed plaintiff Mauricio Chamat

as a third party witness on behalf of its client Precision Development, LLC (Precision) in

an accounting and real estate action filed by Precision against Yuri…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.