P.

P. v. Antonsen CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 17, 2013C068739California1,781 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/17/13 P. v. Antonsen CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C068739

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 05F8308, 06F4080)

MARC LEE ANTONSEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Marc Lee Antonsen appeals from a judgment imposing a state prison sentence of seven years following the revocation of his probation. He contends (1) the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his probation and imposing the prison sentence, and (2) it was reversible error not to have the same judge who sustained the probation violation petitions also conduct the sentencing hearing. We reject both contentions.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Underlying Convictions Case No. 05F8308:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.