United States v. Steven Saepharn
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 201312-30011California236 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 17 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-30011
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:11-cr-00073-RRB
v. MEMORANDUM *
STEVEN SAEPHARN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Ralph R. Beistline, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 14, 2013 **
Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Steven Saepharn appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
his jury-trial conviction for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of
U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), Saepharn’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for
relief, along…