Romelius Ramiro v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
518 F. App'x 552
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 201310-72815California318 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Romelius A. Ramiro, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law and claims of due process violations. Pagayon v. Holder, 675 F.3d 1182, 1189, 1191 (9th Cir.2011) (per curiam). We deny the petition for review.

Ramiro does not dispute that he was convicted of distributing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 860 (a), 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C), and 18 U.S.C. § 2 , and has not established that this conviction is invalid or not final for immigration purposes. See Planes v. Holder, 652 F.3d 991, 996 (9th Cir.2011) (a conviction is final for immigration purposes where a judgment of guilt has been entered and a punishment imposed, even where a direct appeal or collateral attack is pending). Accordingly, the agency properly determined that he is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(A)(iii) (aggravated felony based on illicit trafficking in a controlled substance) and 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(B)® (controlled substance violation).

It follows that the agency did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.