Norman Djuana v. Eric Holder, Jr.

MEMORANDUM

Norman Djuana, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for an abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Cano- Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition for review.

Djuana filed a motion to reopen with the BIA based on Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir.2009) and Tampubolon v. Holder, 610 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir.2010). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Djuana’s motion, where Djuana did not present any evidence of individualized risk of persecution. See Halim v. Holder, 590 F.3d 971, 979 (9th Cir.2009); Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1066 (“[a]n applicant for withholding of removal will need to adduce a considerably larger quantum of individualized-risk evidence to prevail than would an asylum applicant”). The record does not support Djuana’s contention that the BIA failed to apply a disfavored group analysis to his claim. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent…