United States v. Jordan Huff
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 201312-10281California239 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 20 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 12-10281 12-10282 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:07-cr-00156-LJO v.
JORDAN HUFF; MARCUS MAJOR, MEMORANDUM *
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 14, 2013 **
Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Jordan Huff and Marcus Major appeal from
their sentences imposed by the district court following remand. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Huff and Major contend that the district court erred in its interpretation of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the scope of our remand when it declined to…