P.
P. v. Schultz CA1/1
Opinion
Opinion
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant and two others were charged in an information, filed November 9, 2011, with manufacturing “hash oil” (§ 11379.6, subd. (a)), cultivating or processing marijuana (§ 11358), possessing marijuana for sale (§ 11359), and transporting marijuana (§ 11360, subd. (a)). Prior to trial, the court dismissed all but the manufacturing charge. The case was submitted for court trial on the basis of police reports and a declaration from an expert witness retained by the defense. Defendant contested the
1 All statutory references are to the Health and Safety Code unless otherwise indicated. applicability to his conduct of section 11379.6, which prohibits the processing of controlled substances by “chemical extraction” or “chemical synthesis.” According to the police reports, defendant was seen driving away from his residence as the fire department arrived to extinguish a chemical fire. When police located defendant‟s vehicle, it was found to contain several cases of butane, lengths of PVC pipe covered with a honey-colored substance, some of which were filled with marijuana, and several pounds of marijuana. The honey-colored substance was later identified as “butane honey…