Alonzo

Alonzo v. Langridge CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 2013C068767California1,686 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/20/13 Alonzo v. Langridge CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Nevada) ----

ROBERT ALONZO et al., C068767

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 76086)

v.

JESS E. LANGRIDGE,

Defendant and Respondent.

This case arises from a motor vehicle accident in which defendant Jess Langridge collided with plaintiffs Robert and Ashley Alonzo. The Alonzos rejected Langridge‟s offer to settle the case, but then recovered less than the amount of the settlement offer. The trial court awarded Langridge his expert witness fees, including the fees of neurologist Floyd Fortuin as charged by the company ExamWorks, which arranged for Dr. Fortuin to serve as an expert witness for Langridge. The Alonzos appeal from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.