Rivas-Garcia

Rivas-Garcia v. Mukasey

Good Law
282 F. App'x 597
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 2008Nos. 05-77300, 06-71901California283 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Rivas-Garcia petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (Board) decision denying her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture *599 (CAT), and the Board’s subsequent denial of her motion to reopen. We deny her petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion that Rivas-Garcia failed to demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 , 481 & n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Rivas-Garcia never challenged the Board’s conclusion that she failed to establish past persecution and admits that the single incident she suffered in El Salvador did not amount to persecution. Because Rivas-Garcia failed to establish past persecution or to present “credible, direct, and specific evidence in the record of facts that would support a reasonable fear of persecution,” Pedro-Mateo v. INS, 224 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted), she has not presented evidence that would compel reversal of the Board’s determination that she has no well-founded fear of future persecution and is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.