P.

P. v. Keneally CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 21, 2013A134886California980 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/21/13 P. v. Keneally CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A134886

v. SCOTT BANKS KENEALLY, (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No. SCR-585133) Defendant and Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Defendant Scott Banks Keneally and two others were charged in an information, filed November 9, 2011, with manufacturing “hash oil” (Health & Saf. Code,2 § 11379.6, subd. (a)), cultivating or processing marijuana (§ 11358), possessing marijuana for sale (§ 11359), and transporting marijuana (§ 11360, subd. (a)). Prior to a joint trial of defendant and Ryan Schultz, one of the codefendants, the trial court dismissed all but the manufacturing charge on motion of the prosecution. The remaining charge was submitted for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.