United States v. Justin Alford
519 F. App'x 472
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 201312-30136California415 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 21 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-30136
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00009-TSZ
v.
MEMORANDUM *
JUSTIN BLAIR ALFORD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 14, 2013 **
Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Justin Blair Alford appeals from the district court’s order denying his
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Alford contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction based on
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We review de novo whether the
district court had…