United States v. Justin Alford

Good Law
519 F. App'x 472
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 201312-30136California415 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-30136

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00009-TSZ

v.

MEMORANDUM *

JUSTIN BLAIR ALFORD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2013 **

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Justin Blair Alford appeals from the district court’s order denying his

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Alford contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction based on

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We review de novo whether the

district court had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.