Nesbit

Nesbit v. Department of Public Safety

Good Law
283 F. App'x 531
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 2008Nos. 06-16428, 06-16623California1,272 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Pro Se Plaintiffs Anthony Nesbit and William Kotis allege they were attacked by prison gang members while incarcerated in the high security portion of Hawaii’s Halawa Correctional Facility (“HCF”). Plaintiffs are not gang members, and assert that the assaults were the foreseeable result of a prison policy that housed prison gangs with unaffiliated inmates while at the same time segregating rival gangs from each other. Plaintiffs claim that the policy violated their Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, and filed § 1983 claims against the Hawaii Department of Public Safety and various prison officials.

The district court dismissed the claims for damages against officials acting in their official capacity, ruling they were barred by the Eleventh Amendment and incognizable under § 1983. The court also ruled that the claims for injunctive relief became moot when Plaintiffs were transferred from the Halawa facility to a contract prison in Mississippi. Then, after the magistrate judge limited discovery in light of the district court’s rulings, the district court granted summary judgment on virtually all of the remaining claims, finding no evidence that any Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.