Sanai

Sanai v. Alexander

Good Law
283 F. App'x 551
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 2008No. 07-35305California285 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The memorandum disposition file on May 6, 2008, is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.

The petition for panel rehearing is denied. We deny Appellant’s request for an order directing the district court to stay the action because the request was raised for the first time in the petition for rehearing.

MEMORANDUM **

Fredric Sanai, an attorney, appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging civil rights violations in connection with his Washington State Bar disciplinary proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

Younger abstention requires dismissal of this action. See Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 , 91 S.Ct. 746 , 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971); see also Middlesex County Ethics Comm. v. Garden State Bar Ass’n, 457 U.S. 423, 434 , 102 S.Ct. 2515 , 73 L.Ed.2d 116 (1982) (setting forth Younger abstention doctrine requirements in the context of state bar disciplinary proceedings); *552 Hirsh v. Justices of Supreme Court of Cal., 67 F.3d 708 , 713 (9th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (concluding that Younger abstention was appropriate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.