Contreras

Contreras v. Mukasey

Good Law
284 F. App'x 449
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 2008No. 06-75347California351 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Solis Contreras, a native and citizen of Mexico and a lawful permanent *450 resident of the United States, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his motion to reconsider the underlying denial of his application for cancellation of removal for lawful permanent residents pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act § 240A(a), 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a). In the underlying proceedings, the immigration judge determined that petitioner was eligible for cancellation of removal, but denied such relief after weighing the equities and exercising its discretion.

Solis Contreras contends that the BIA abused its discretion in denying his motion to reconsider by failing to consider all the facts and circumstances surrounding the IJ’s determination that petitioner did not merit a favorable exercise of its discretion concerning his request for cancellation relief. We conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s prior order affirming the IJ’s decision to deny cancellation of removal. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(1);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.