Vizcarra Arrendondo v. Mukasey

Good Law
285 F. App'x 382
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 2008No. 04-71146California222 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Josefina Vizcarra Arrendondo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

The IJ denied Vizcarra Arrendondo’:: application for cancellation of removal f

The petition for review is timely only as . to the BIA’s first order, though we lack jurisdiction to review that order because it is based on a discretionary hardship determination. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir.2005). In her opening brief, Vizcarra Arrendondo challenges only the BIA’s second order denying reopening, yet we lack jurisdiction to review it because Vizcarra Arrendondo , did not file a petition for review of that order. See 8 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.