Solis

United States v. Solis

Good Law
286 F. App'x 463
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 2008No. 05-10411California257 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Joel Solis appeals from the. 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand.

As a threshold matter, we reject the government’s contention that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal of a within-guidelines sentence. See United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1128-29 (9th Cir. 2006).

Solis contends that the sentence is unreasonable because the district court stated that it gave “extra weight” to the Guidelines. We note that Solis preserved this contention by disputing at sentencing the Government’s characterization of the Guidelines as presumptively reasonable. The district court did not have benefit of our recent holding in United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc), that a district court may not give the Guidelines more or less weight than any of the factors that are to be taken into account under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). See id. (“It would have been error had the judge actually attached a presumption of reasonableness to the Guidelines range or weighted the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.