Alvarez-Ornelas

Alvarez-Ornelas v. Mukasey

Good Law
286 F. App'x 524
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 7, 2008No. 06-74622California262 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jaime Alvarez-Ornelas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision pretermit-ting his application for lawful permanent resident cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, including due process claims. Agyeman v. INS, 296 F.3d 871, 876 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition for review.

We agree with the BIA’s conclusion that Alvarez-Ornelas is ineligible for cancellation of removal because he lacked five years of lawful permanent residence. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(1); Monet v. INS, 791 F.2d 752, 753 (9th Cir.1986) (defining the term “lawfully” to denote “compliance with substantive legal requirements, not mere procedural regularity”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The BIA determined that because Alvarez-Ornelas testified he first entered the United States in 1987, he could not have lawfully adjusted his status under the Special Agricultural Worker (“SAW”) statute. See 8 U.S.C. § 1160 (a)(1)(B) (a SAW applicant must establish that he performed at least 90 days…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.