Barber

Barber v. Simpson

Good Law
286 F. App'x 969
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 2008No. 06-16880California1,010 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Wesley Barber appeals a judgment of the district court denying declaratory and injunctive relief from an eviction order entered in the Washoe Tribal Court, evicting him from a plot of land within Washoe Indian Country. Both Barber and appellees Simpson and Turner, the plaintiffs in the tribal court eviction action, are members of the Washoe Tribe. Barber argues that the tribal court lacked jurisdiction to order his eviction because 1) the United States was an indispensable but unjoined party in the action against him, and 2) 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (f) gives the federal district courts exclusive original jurisdiction over quiet title actions involving property in which the United States has an interest.

The district court properly found that it had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . See Nat’l Farmers Union Ins. Cos. v. Crow Tribe of Indians, 471 U.S. 845, 853 , 105 S.Ct. 2447 , 85 L.Ed.2d 818 (1985) (“[A] federal court may determine under § 1331 whether a tribal court has exceeded the lawful limits of its jurisdiction.”).

When reviewing a tribal court decision regarding tribal jurisdiction, this court reviews…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.