Susanto

Susanto v. Mukasey

Good Law
288 F. App'x 317
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 2008No. 05-70919California299 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Andre Eka Susanto, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of ImmigTation Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing an appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency's denial of withholding of removal, Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001), and deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that the changed circumstances or extraordinary circumstances exceptions excused the untimely filing of Susanto's asylum application. See Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 648, 657 (9th Cir.2007).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ's denial of withholding of removal because there is no evidence that Susanto or anyone in his family has ever been charged, arrested or physically harmed on account of their ethnicity or religion. See Hakeem, 273 F.3d at 817 . Furthermore, even assuming the disfavored group analysis set forth in Sael v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 922 (9th Cir.2004) applies in the context of withholding of removal, Susanto has not demonstrated the requisite…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.