Olea

Olea v. Mukasey

Good Law
289 F. App'x 176
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 7, 2008No. 06-71117California309 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Martha Elia Olea, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Administrative Appeals Unit’s (“AAU”) order dismissing her appeal from the former Immigration and Naturalization Service’s (“INS”) decision denying her application for legal temporary residence as a Special Agricultural Worker (“SAW”) under 8 U.S.C. § 1160 . We have jurisdiction to review the denial of a SAW application pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1160 (e)(3). We will reverse a decision of the AAU where it abuses its discretion or makes findings that are contrary to clear and convincing facts contained in the record considered as a whole. See Perez-Martin v. Ashcroft, 394 F.3d 752, 758 (9th Cir.2005); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1160 (e)(3)(B).

The AAU did not abuse its discretion when it determined that Olea’s witness affidavits were of little probative value and did not establish Olea’s eligibility for relief in light of the government’s evidence that called into question her claim of employment by Cayetano Godina. See Perez-Martin, 394 F.3d at 759-60 (to overcome derogatory government evidence, an applicant must provide enough evidence to show qualifying employment “as a matter of just and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.